Outcomes of Pedal Artery Angioplasty Are Independent of the Severity of Inframalleolar Disease: A Subanalysis of the Multicenter RENDEZVOUS Registry.

Purpose: To examine the efficacy of pedal artery angioplasty (PAA) for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) according to the severity of inframalleolar disease. Methods: In total, 257 consecutive CLTI patients (mean age 73.2 years; 175 men) with de novo infrapopliteal and inframalleolar artery disease were enrolled from the retrospective RENDEZVOUS registry. Inframalleolar artery disease was classified as moderate (Kawarada type 2, 144 patients) or severe (Kawarada type 3, 113 patients). PAA was performed in 140 patients: 66 (45.8%) with moderate disease and 74 (65.5%) with severe disease. The remaining 117 patients (78 with moderate disease and 39 with severe disease) underwent interventions that did not include PAA. The primary outcomes were the wound healing and limb salvage rates at 12 months after the initial treatment. The outcomes of the PAA and no-PAA groups were examined to determine any correlation between treatment efficacy and baseline disease severity. Results: The success rates of PAA among the patients with moderate and severe inframalleolar disease were 89.4% and 87.8%, respectively (p=0.683). The wound healing rate at 12 months was significantly higher in the PAA group than in the no-PAA group regardless of the severity of inframalleolar disease [moderate: 58.8% vs 40.0% (p=0.049); severe: 59.6% vs 33.2% (p=0.021), respectively]. The worst limb salvage rate (76.9%) was seen among patients in the no-PAA group with severe inframalleolar disease (no-PAA/moderate: 94.8%; PAA/moderate: 90.9%; and PAA/severe: 87.8%, p=0.028). Conclusion: PAA improves the wound healing rate of patients with CLTI regardless of the severity of inframalleolar disease. This treatment modality also might improve limb salvage rates in patients with severe inframalleolar disease affecting both the anterior and posterior pedal circulations.

Clinical Outcomes of Pedal Artery Angioplasty for Patients With Ischemic Wounds: Results From the Multicenter RENDEZVOUS Registry.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes of pedal artery angioplasty (PAA) for patients with critical limb ischemia. BACKGROUND: Pedal artery disease is considered a predictor of delayed wound healing (DH) after endovascular therapy. Adjunctive PAA might improve the speed and extent of wound healing. METHODS: Consecutive patients with critical limb ischemia (n = 257) presenting with de novo infrapopliteal and pedal artery disease were retrospectively reviewed from a multicenter registry. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether PAA was performed (n = 140) or not (n = 117). The rate of wound healing and time to wound healing were compared between these groups. DH score was calculated using the number of independent predictors of DH. Patients were stratified into 3 groups according to DH score: low risk (DH score = 0), moderate risk (DH score = 1 or 2), and high risk (DH score = 3). Estimated efficacy was analyzed for each risk-stratified population. RESULTS: The rate of wound healing was significantly higher (57.5% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.003) and time to wound healing significantly shorter (211 days vs. 365 days; p = 0.008) in the PAA group. In a multivariate analysis, nonambulatory status, target wound depth (UT grade ≥2), and daily hemodialysis were revealed as predictors of DH. In the moderate-risk population, adjunctive PAA significantly improved the rate of wound healing (59.3% vs. 33.9%; p = 0.001). In the high-risk population, however, PAA did not affect wound healing. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent PAA showed a higher rate of wound healing and shorter time to wound healing, especially in the moderate-risk population. With regard to wound healing, this aggressive strategy might become a salvage procedure for patients with critical limb ischemia presenting with pedal artery disease.